
Recently, I attended a priest's quorum lesson during which the discussion turned to the matter of profanity in literature. I held my tongue despite my objection to many of the things that were said. I appreciated that there was a liveliness in the participation which is the antithesis of the norm. But, I certainly can't keep quiet when I feel strongly about something.
In essence, the discussion went something along the lines of some of the priests expressing their discomfort at having to read some foul language in books like Grapes of Wrath, Of Mice and Men, Raisin in the Sun, etc. Now, I can certainly understand that when I was that age, I also remember it to be somewhat appalling. However...from what little I have read from the great literary works, I have come to understand the value of those works. I wouldn't say because of the profanity...but, neither would I say that it is in spite of it. I'm know that some of the young men in the room who were objecting to the things that they were reading at the behest of their teachers went to see Iron Man of their own free will and mentioned no similar discomfort at language that was no less profane than anything that they could possibly have read in any of Steinbeck's novels. Am I saying that they should not have seen the movie? No, I enjoyed it myself. But, what I am saying is it is inconsistent. Iron Man can be a wonderful movie despite the occasional vulgarity but Catcher in the Rye is too offensive. In my conversations with others regarding this subject I have had various perspectives on the matter but all have been similarly conclusive: there is value in looking past the vulgarity. In D&C 88:118, we are told that "as all have not faith, seek ye diligently and teach one another words of wisdom; yea, seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom; seek learning, even by study and also by faith." A work does not diminish in value because it has swearwords, violence, or even sexuality in some cases. The work diminishes in value because of how it uses those things. If someone writes a book laden with obscenities merely for the sake of venting their own desire to be profane, then there is no depth to their work at all. However, in the case of Steinbeck or Salinger, their characters swear because that is their character. Now, can we read Of Mice and Men and notice only the cussing? Certainly. And if that is the case, then it is not worth reading. But, if this is the case, it is truly sad, for it is indicative of a lack of maturity. The ability to see what is truly going on in the story rather than focusing on what the characters are saying is what allows us to find value. One may watch The Passion of the Christ and see extremely graphic violence that depicts the suffering of Christ and gain an invaluably increased appreciation for the Savior. Another may watch a YouTube video of teens beating one of their peers to a pulp, which has violence of a similar nature to The Passion...but it is not likely that they will gain anything except a permissive attitude toward the perpetration of assault against their fellowman. Could someone gain such a permissive attitude from The Passion? Sure. But, one would be mistaken in thinking that was the intent of the film's creator. It is sincerely doubtful that Gibson ever intended to advocate brutality by depicting the savagery that Christ experienced. One could not rightly assume that the same is true of the prideful youth who posted the uproar on YouTube. As another example, Michaelangelo's David is a tremendously valuable and beautiful work of art depicting a naked man. It is a beneficial contribution to the world of understanding the beauty of the human body. But, can someone view this statue in a perverted way? Without a doubt. Does this mean that nobody should view the statue? Absolutely not. It does mean that people ought to be conscious of themselves and know whether they would have the ability to view something of that nature. It is somewhat a connection to the admonition from the Lord that we should not need to be compelled or commanded in all things. We ought to know ourselves well enough to govern ourselves. We ought to be mature enough to see the value in things. We also ought to be mature enough to be able to know when enough is enough, too. A somewhat altered serenity prayer is applicable: God grant me the serenity to see the things that can teach me, the courage to turn away from the things that will hurt me and the wisdom to know the difference. Does one's life become of less value because of its profane nature? Because of my sins and shortcomings can I have nothing of value to say? And does this give liberty to everyone else who has their own struggles to judge the things I say and do as worthless? I am sure that there is more that can be said...but, I am just about out of time.
Sorry if that was too ranty. I had to say it, though. TTFN.